Filters
Concerns reviewed
60
In current filter
Within timeframe
70%
Target ≥ 95%
Risk assessment documented
85%
Target ≥ 95%
Safeguarding lead notified
83.3%
Target ≥ 95%
Referral / rationale documented
91.7%
Target ≥ 95%
Outcome documented
70%
Target ≥ 90%
Criteria meeting target
4/26
Numerically-computed audit criteria only. Others need manual review.
Criteria below target
22
See findings and improvement tabs for planned actions.
Most common documentation gap
Not documented within timeframe
18 cases in current filter.
Compliance by criterion
% of cases meeting each computed criterion
Compliance by clinical area
% documented within local timeframe
Timeliness — run chart
Weekly compliance with median and target
Pareto — common documentation gaps
Where documentation is falling short
Concern categories
All cases in current filter
Child / adult / both
Split of concern types
Suggested improvement opportunities
Editable in the Improvement tab
Not documented within timeframe — 18 cases. Consider EPR templates, named safeguarding lead visibility and MDT huddles.
Outcome not documented — 18 cases. Consider EPR templates, named safeguarding lead visibility and MDT huddles.
No immediate safety plan — 12 cases. Consider EPR templates, named safeguarding lead visibility and MDT huddles.
Safeguarding lead not notified — 10 cases. Consider EPR templates, named safeguarding lead visibility and MDT huddles.
MCA not completed (adult) — 10 cases. Consider EPR templates, named safeguarding lead visibility and MDT huddles.
Safety prompt
Any immediate safeguarding, child protection, adult at risk, domestic abuse, exploitation, self-harm or suicide risk concern identified during this audit must be escalated in real time through the named safeguarding lead and local statutory pathways. Do not rely on this audit tool for urgent escalation.