Inclusion, exclusion and audit criteria

DEMO DATA

Who to include, who to exclude, and the 31 audit criteria measured in this cycle.

Inclusion criteria
  • •Any patient with a documented safeguarding concern raised during the audit period
  • •Concerns relating to children and young people under 18
  • •Concerns relating to adults with care and support needs under the Care Act 2014
  • •Concerns involving domestic abuse, exploitation, modern slavery, radicalisation and self-neglect
  • •Cases identified in inpatient, ED, outpatient, community, mental health and maternity settings within scope
  • •Electronic, paper or hybrid records depending on local setup
Exclusion criteria & limitations
  • •Cases where no safeguarding concern was raised or documented
  • •Cases outside the selected audit period
  • •Duplicate concerns or duplicate records for the same episode
  • •Records unavailable for review
  • •Cases where the local safeguarding lead has requested exclusion from routine audit
  • •Cases where governance approval is required but has not been obtained
  • •Direct patient identifiers must not be entered into the tool
Audit criteria (31)
Aligned with Working Together to Safeguard Children (2023), the Care Act 2014, NICE NG76, the Intercollegiate Safeguarding Competency Frameworks and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. Compliance is calculated using Yes and No responses only; Not applicable and Unable to determine are excluded from the denominator.
  1. C1
    Safeguarding concern clearly documented in the clinical record.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  2. C2
    Concern documented within the locally agreed timeframe of identification.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  3. C3
    Type of safeguarding concern (child, adult or both) clearly identified.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  4. C4
    Category of concern documented (physical, sexual, emotional, neglect, financial, domestic abuse, exploitation, self-neglect, mental-health-related or other).
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  5. C5
    Chronology of events documented factually and objectively.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  6. C6
    Patient / child voice documented in their own words where possible.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  7. C7
    Physical findings documented objectively (body maps where appropriate).
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  8. C8
    Household / dependants / siblings considered and documented where relevant.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  9. C9
    Risk assessment completed and documented.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  10. C10
    Immediate safety plan documented where risk identified.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  11. C11
    Named safeguarding lead / named doctor / named nurse notified.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  12. C12
    Notification documented with time, date and named person.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  13. C13
    External referral to Local Authority / MASH made where indicated.
    Target ≥ 95% · auto-computed from submissions
  14. C14
    Referral documented with reference number or acknowledgement.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  15. C15
    Police involvement considered and documented where applicable.
    Target ≥ 90% · manual review
  16. C16
    Mental Capacity Assessment completed where relevant (adult).
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  17. C17
    Capacity documented with rationale where MCA required.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  18. C18
    Best-interests decision documented if the adult lacks capacity.
    Target ≥ 90% · manual review
  19. C19
    Consent and information sharing discussed and documented.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  20. C20
    Information-sharing rationale documented (Caldicott / vital interests).
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  21. C21
    Making Safeguarding Personal principles applied (adult).
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  22. C22
    Child Protection Plan / Child in Need status checked (child).
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  23. C23
    Multidisciplinary discussion / safeguarding huddle documented.
    Target ≥ 85% · auto-computed from submissions
  24. C24
    Follow-up / reassessment plan documented.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  25. C25
    Discharge safety plan documented where relevant.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  26. C26
    Communication with GP / community teams / school nurse / health visitor documented.
    Target ≥ 85% · auto-computed from submissions
  27. C27
    Outcome of safeguarding action documented and closed out.
    Target ≥ 90% · auto-computed from submissions
  28. C28
    Any escalation or safety concern actioned appropriately and in a timely manner.
    Target ≥ 100% · auto-computed from submissions
  29. C29
    Documentation is clear enough for another clinician or safeguarding lead to understand the concern and plan.
    Target ≥ 90% · manual review
  30. C30
    Records are contemporaneous, legible, dated, timed and signed with role/grade.
    Target ≥ 95% · manual review
  31. C31
    Documentation meets local safeguarding policy and statutory expectations.
    Target ≥ 90% · manual review